MEP Christine Anderson: Why the IHR Amendments need to be rejected

Remarks by MEP Christine Anderson (Germany) at the International Summit “Reject the W.H.O. and the Globalist Coup!” on July 15, 2025.

TRANSCRIPT

NOTE: This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may contain grammatical and spelling errors incurred during transcription. Please refer to the referenced media to confirm.

Hon. Christine Anderson, MEP (Germany):

Thank you so much for having me. It’s good to see you again. And it’s really quite a fantastic group you put together here. So thank you very much for allowing me to be part of this fantastic group. So what we’ve been seeing in the recent decades, a quiet yet coordinated power grab has unfolded on the world stage. And it’s not one led by tanks or tyrants or by unelected. It’s led by unelected bureaucrats, multinational elites and supranational institutions. And under the banner of globalism, these actors have sought to centralize authority, wrote national borders, and bypass democratic processes in favor of a technocratic governance. This is not a conspiracy in the shadows. It is a strategy playing out in plain sight and often cloaked in the language of progress, sustainability, diversity and global cooperation and all of that. Globalists often portray their policies as solutions to transnational problems climate change, pandemics, financial instability. But beneath this rhetoric lies a systematic attempt to override the will of local populations, the will of the people dilute national sovereignty, and condition people to surrender their freedoms in exchange for promises of security and prosperity. The manipulation is subtle but very effective. The appeal to fear, guilt and moral urgency to bypass debate and stifle dissent. Just take a look at the word Constitution. The whole purpose of a constitution was, and still is, to limit government, to bind them to the rule of law. And its main function is to protect the citizen from government.

Now the Constitution and the rights enshrined in it are being redefined to not only protect government from citizen, but to also provide the government with legitimate power to undermine fundamental rights and ultimately abolish them all together. And elected officials have been rather successful in convincing people that the Constitution no longer serves as a guarantee of freedom from government, but rather as a guarantee of freedom by the government. Thus giving the government increasingly more competences in more areas in which they can oppose a regulation to intervene in citizen’s everyday life. I’ve been saying it in the past during Covid. Covid was in fact just a test balloon. They wanted to see how far they could go in restricting freedom, democracy and the rule of law without encountering too much resistance. The undermining of fundamental rights. However, it was at that stage done predominantly cognitively. By redefining concepts, fundamental rights are now privileges, collectives, needs, trumps, the individual needs and so forth, and publicly shaming dissidents. But the cognitive approach or gaslighting, I should say, only got them so far. This test balloon Covid was also needed to find out what changes were required to impose even more severe restrictions. And they actually did identify two main areas. Area one legislation and the other one is competences in the institutions. So legislation quite obvious actually, the most obvious being a national infectious disease laws and what the state can take for as countermeasures.

They have all been pretty much throughout all the countries been amended and changed so they could lead up to the standards of the so-called Covid pandemic, but also so-called disinformation campaigns under initiatives to combat hate speech or misinformation. Governments and tech platforms, often advised by global think tanks, have increasingly censored dissenting voices, especially those critical of lockdowns, mRNA injections and Climate mandates free speech as the fundamental pillar of freedom. Democracy and the rule of law in their mind can no longer be allowed as it threatens the politically desired narrative institutions when it comes to that. Yes, they found out the elected officials and the democratic institutions, they ran into a problem. Had they back then implemented even more severe restrictions, they would have had they would have run the risk of not getting re-elected. And trust me, the risk of not getting reelected is the only thing that kept them from imposing even a more severe restrictions. And this is where now the pandemic treaty proposals by the W.H.O. actually come in in response to Covid 19, proposals have emerged to grant the World Health Organization expanded and powers to declare health emergencies and dictate responses globally. This would sideline national governments and impose top down mandates on populations without local accountability. Elected officials. With the W.H.O., having these powers would no longer have to make these decisions anymore. They are reduced, or they reduced themselves to the recipients of orders which they merely execute.

And this provides them with what I call plausible deniability, because if they were held accountable by the constituents for restrictions imposed on the citizens, they can now claim it wasn’t my decision. I would have never done that to you. But the W.H.O. mandated it. So I have to. But and then they will say we’re bound by contract to act and legislate according to the AU’s decision making. So it turns out Democracy itself is an obstacle which needs to be overcome, not by outright abolishing it, but by telling people. Or gaslighting them into believing it’s solely done for their benefit in their own good. And we are seeing some examples of that. You have the climate policy and energy regulation under the guise of combating. I mean, we need to save the planet, right? So they need to impose all kinds of restrictions. We have the mass migration policies. Global compacts and treaties often pressure countries to accept mass migration, diluting cultural cohesion and placing stain strain on the public services, all while criminalizing those who oppose such measures as xenophobic. Then you have, of course, the transgender madness. Under initiatives to combat hate speech and misinformation, government and tech platforms advertised by global think tanks once again are also increasing these voices, and that must be one of the most despicable programs they actually implemented, is to tell little children they were born in the wrong body, and now we have to hack up their bodies to fix them.

But the point is this – God brought us to this earth and the way he made us. We are perfect just the way we are. But each of these policies advances a vision of a borderless, post democratic transhumanism world, one where is no longer government of the people, for the people, and by the people. But it will be a government of the global misanthropy, for the global misanthropy, and by the global misanthropy. As we move forward, the challenge is clear reclaim democratic control, protect national sovereignty and resist the slow erosion of freedoms under the weight of coordinated global agendas. The price of inaction today is the future in which our once free, liberal and democratic societies, consisting of free individuals, are to be transformed into a collective in which the individual is merely part of a mindless, malleable mass. Under the totalitarian rule of global misanthropy, kept in check with the ultimate control tools of digital ID and digital currency. Along being imprisoned along with being imprisoned in these 15 minute ghettos. We owe it to our fathers and grandfathers who literally spilled their blood to fight former authoritarian rulers, to ensure that we, their children, would be able to live in freedom, democracy and the rule of law. It is their sacrifice which obliges us to keep and defend this very precious gift for our children and our children’s children. We need to act now.

Reggie Littlejohn:

Thank you so very much. Honorable Christine Anderson, what a powerful speech and a great way to start us off. And we all owe you a huge debt of gratitude for carrying the torch in Europe and all over the world.